Do you realize that you just paraphrased what I said? You used the word "transfer", I used "insert", as that is how Monsanto described it. Otherwise, you said the same thing I said.Nerien wrote:Exactly where in there website is this? Can you please give the exact link, because I am not finding it. I have found where they describe using Bt to transfer in the genes that are then used by the plant cell to produce the compound that is toxic to the insects, causing them to die when they consume the plant.DamonIRB wrote: Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is an insecticide with unusual properties that make it useful for pest control in certain situations.
Bt is a insecticide/pesticide. Monsanto explains, in detail, how they take this soil born bacterium that is commonly used as a commercial pesticide and insert it into the DNA of a plant, confusing the plant, making it think the bacterium is supposed to be there. When a bug eats the plant, they die. Why? Because they have unwittingly ingested a pesticide that lives within the plant that causes their digestive system to shut down. Monsanto has done the same thing with their 'Roundup Ready Crops', but with a herbicide, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which renders the plant immune to glyphosate, the main ingredient in Round Up weed killer.
Monsanto.com - What is Biotechnology?
Second paragraph on the page, first line.
Sounds like our difference is semantic. If you wish to continue your assault on my intelligence, explaining how much more highly educated you are and therefore much more capable of understanding what a GMO is, great. Have at it. I've had people telling me I was an idiot for years, so you telling me I'm an idiot is nothing new. Ironically though, everyone that says I'm wrong ends up doing exactly what you've done and simply paraphrased what I've said.
Paul - the Arizona Institue for Advanced Medicine is not an anti-GMO establishment and they conduct "hard scientific" research. Colorado State University has one of the most highly regarded biology and botany labs in the country, and is not an anti-GMO establishment. The former medical science advisor to the EPA is not a quack, and certainly isn't someone that promotes conspiracy theories. My apologies if you felt the video was insufficent.
Again, I'll say that my original question concerning the use of canola oil is some finch food was based solely on the interest of my birds and their health. How we went from such a basic question to bashing Damon for being someone concerned about GMO's baffles me. I will concede to the point to your superior intelligence and knowledge, and will post no further on this topic.
Damon