Which mutations is more Hardy?

Learn about mutations and expected breeding outcomes.
Post Reply
User avatar
wcabbab
Hatchling
Hatchling
Posts: 54
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 7:26 pm
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

Which mutations is more Hardy?

Post by wcabbab » Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:31 am

Specifically

Blue vs Silver vs Pastel?

I'm up in the air with it? In the past, I've only loss Blues and Pastels to unknown causes.
____________________
Wayne

12 Lady Gouldians
2 Cordon Bleu
1 Dusky Pionus
Cocker Spaniel
Yorkshire Terrier


http://karmaleta.webs.com

User avatar
L in Ontario
Mod Emeritus
Mod Emeritus
Posts: 13365
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 10:29 am
Location: Barrie, Ontario Canada
Contact:

Re: Which mutations is more Hardy?

Post by L in Ontario » Thu Oct 13, 2011 11:32 am

They (Gouldians) are all the same for me including yellows and greens.
Liz

User avatar
nixity
Molting
Molting
Posts: 3726
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:13 pm
Location: Gainesville, FL
Contact:

Re: Which mutations is more Hardy?

Post by nixity » Thu Oct 13, 2011 11:32 am

Well - they're all three "blue" mutations, the only real difference is that Silver and Pastels are a combination of blue and yellow.

I wouldn't think any of the three would be more hardy than the other. I happen to believe that Yellow is a pretty strong mutation so I don't think it would necessarily weaken a blue by being combined, but I guess some people feel that Silvers are weak because it's the most "mutated" the bird can be.

As long as the birds are healthy and come from good lines, I think you should see strong babies regardless of the mutation :)

User avatar
CandoAviary
Good Egg
Good Egg
Posts: 8554
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:21 pm
Location: Panama City Beach, FL
Contact:

Re: Which mutations is more Hardy?

Post by CandoAviary » Thu Oct 13, 2011 11:56 am

nixity wrote: As long as the birds are healthy and come from good lines, I think you should see strong babies regardless of the mutation :)
Agree 100%, With any of the color mutations, the genetic lineage, care, and enviroment go much further than what the particular color of the bird may be. :wink:

debbie276
Bird Brain
Bird Brain
Posts: 14789
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:30 am
Location: WV

Re: Which mutations is more Hardy?

Post by debbie276 » Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:53 pm

Also agree with Tiffany and Candace
Debbie
long time breeder of lady gouldians:
Green
SF Pastel (SF Yellow)
Pastel (Yellow)
Blue
SF Pastel Blue (SF Yellow Blue)
Pastel Blue (Yellow Blue)

GREAT articles on avian lighting:
https://mickaboo.org/confluence/downloa ... ummary.pdf
http://www.naturallighting.com/cart/sto ... sc_page=56

User avatar
lovemyfinch
Mod Extraordinaire
Mod Extraordinaire
Posts: 10036
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:12 am
Location: St-Hippolyte, Qc

Re: Which mutations is more Hardy?

Post by lovemyfinch » Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:44 am

I agree wholeheartedly :D
I haven't seen any difference whatsoever.
Janine

shaftails,gouldians,societies,green singers,owls,cubans, and 1 parrotlet
Image

User avatar
wcabbab
Hatchling
Hatchling
Posts: 54
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 7:26 pm
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

Re: Which mutations is more Hardy?

Post by wcabbab » Fri Oct 14, 2011 8:55 am

So given that all birds are equal. Do you think it is ok to breed a blue x blue, or blue x silver, or silver x silver, or pastel x pastel, .........etc?
____________________
Wayne

12 Lady Gouldians
2 Cordon Bleu
1 Dusky Pionus
Cocker Spaniel
Yorkshire Terrier


http://karmaleta.webs.com

User avatar
nixity
Molting
Molting
Posts: 3726
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:13 pm
Location: Gainesville, FL
Contact:

Re: Which mutations is more Hardy?

Post by nixity » Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:33 am

That's a different question... I don't think you should - but for a number of reasons. Someone recently posted an excellent response to this question.. lemme see if I can find it..

User avatar
nixity
Molting
Molting
Posts: 3726
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:13 pm
Location: Gainesville, FL
Contact:

Re: Which mutations is more Hardy?

Post by nixity » Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:50 am

Found it :D http://finchforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=8 ... 65#p163965

Ebichua wrote:To understand these claims of blue to blue (yes or no), folks need to understand some minor key notes in genetics.

When a male and female come together, generally, both sexes have different gene pools. We can call this heterozygosity. Heterozygosity is important when it comes to male/female breeding because this means their children get a mixture of genetics that enable them to survive the forever changing environment around us.

However, when heterozygosity drops, this means you've been breeding siblings to siblings or closely related male/female pairs together. When it becomes a homo(same)zygosity organism to another, then their offspring's genetics stop growing, so to speak, and thus makes it difficult for them to adapt to the natural changing environment. This changing environment could be something as little as increase in world's temp, weather changes, evolving bacteria, so on. Without good genes, offspring come out weak because their gene pool aren't growing anymore and so they die off and survivors are often not the best quality specimens one can find.

This applies to ALL organisms that require a male and female. Not just to blue gouldians, not just on birds, but to all organisms that require to mate. With that being said, keep in mind of where you are getting the birds and what gene pool they're from. Thats all you need to worry about. Ignore the color, ignore what kind of bird it is. Worry about if they are related or not.

This genetics rule applies to ALL birds that we breed. You don't want to breed normal to normal and keep breeding siblings with each other. This causes inbreeding, which is the main concern to why people don't like blue to blue. Because blue is one of the newer and more expensive gouldians out there. New + Expensive means people will breed siblings with each other in order to avoid paying another 150 or more for another bird. Thus, causing poor genetics.

Blue gouldians have been out for a while now and it is generally safe to breed the two together. Going for a blue + different color (Say green) isn't exactly THAT safe either. What if the green back is a heavily inbred green back? It has poor genes too and so your offspring may come out with some retardations or negative mutations. Or what if the blue back was heavily inbred and the green back wasn't? Same results. What if both are inbred? Even worse.

Bottomline, a diverse gene pool is the way to go. Know your sources.

User avatar
wcabbab
Hatchling
Hatchling
Posts: 54
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 7:26 pm
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

Re: Which mutations is more Hardy?

Post by wcabbab » Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:46 pm

Thanks Tiffany.
____________________
Wayne

12 Lady Gouldians
2 Cordon Bleu
1 Dusky Pionus
Cocker Spaniel
Yorkshire Terrier


http://karmaleta.webs.com

Meagan83
Incubating
Incubating
Posts: 904
Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 4:03 pm
Location: Kentucky

Re: Which mutations is more Hardy?

Post by Meagan83 » Wed Oct 19, 2011 1:11 pm

nixity wrote:Found it :D http://finchforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=8 ... 65#p163965

Ebichua wrote:To understand these claims of blue to blue (yes or no), folks need to understand some minor key notes in genetics.

When a male and female come together, generally, both sexes have different gene pools. We can call this heterozygosity. Heterozygosity is important when it comes to male/female breeding because this means their children get a mixture of genetics that enable them to survive the forever changing environment around us.

However, when heterozygosity drops, this means you've been breeding siblings to siblings or closely related male/female pairs together. When it becomes a homo(same)zygosity organism to another, then their offspring's genetics stop growing, so to speak, and thus makes it difficult for them to adapt to the natural changing environment. This changing environment could be something as little as increase in world's temp, weather changes, evolving bacteria, so on. Without good genes, offspring come out weak because their gene pool aren't growing anymore and so they die off and survivors are often not the best quality specimens one can find.

This applies to ALL organisms that require a male and female. Not just to blue gouldians, not just on birds, but to all organisms that require to mate. With that being said, keep in mind of where you are getting the birds and what gene pool they're from. Thats all you need to worry about. Ignore the color, ignore what kind of bird it is. Worry about if they are related or not.

This genetics rule applies to ALL birds that we breed. You don't want to breed normal to normal and keep breeding siblings with each other. This causes inbreeding, which is the main concern to why people don't like blue to blue. Because blue is one of the newer and more expensive gouldians out there. New + Expensive means people will breed siblings with each other in order to avoid paying another 150 or more for another bird. Thus, causing poor genetics.

Blue gouldians have been out for a while now and it is generally safe to breed the two together. Going for a blue + different color (Say green) isn't exactly THAT safe either. What if the green back is a heavily inbred green back? It has poor genes too and so your offspring may come out with some retardations or negative mutations. Or what if the blue back was heavily inbred and the green back wasn't? Same results. What if both are inbred? Even worse.

Bottomline, a diverse gene pool is the way to go. Know your sources.
"Know your sources" That's most important I think. I don't think there should be a problem breeding certain color mutation with each other as long as the pairing has no chance of relation and the birds are from people you trust. Multiple sources that are trusted. I obtained my birds through trusted friends. Paranoid trusted friends :lol: . People who are so against related breedings that they keep records of all their birds, or can atleast provide records during a sale or trade.

Post Reply